4.7 Article

Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 81-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.006

关键词

Magnetic nanoparticles; Orange peel; Cadmium ions; Adsorption kinetics; Isotherm; Thermodynamics

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An agricultural waste-orange peel powder (OPP) was successfully modified into a novel magnetic nanoadsorbent (MNP-OPP) by co-precipitating it with Fe3O4 nanoparticles (MNP) for cadmium ion removal from aqueous solutions. Characterization of MNP-OPP by FTIR, SEM, XRD, TEM and VSM revealed the covalent binding of hydroxyl groups of MNP with the carboxyl groups of OPP, and further confirmed its physico-chemical properties favorable for metal binding. The cadmium adsorption onto MNP-OPP, MNP and OPP was tested under different pH, ionic strength, natural organic matter, adsorbate concentration, contact time and temperature conditions. Results revealed a faster kinetics and efficiency of MNP-OPP in comparison to those of MNP and OPP and further confirmed a complexation and ion exchange mechanism to be operative in metal binding. The adsorption equilibrium data obeyed. the Langmuir model and the kinetic data were well described by the pseudo-second-order model. Thermodynamic studies revealed the feasibility and endothermic nature of the system. Breakthrough capacity from column experiments, adequate desorption as well as reusability without significant loss of efficiency established the practicality of the developed system. Cadmium removal was achieved at 82% from a simulated electroplating industry wastewater. The experimental results reveal the technical feasibility of MNP-OPP, its easy synthesis, recovery, economic, eco-friendly and a promising advanced adsorbent in environmental pollution cleanup. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据