4.7 Article

Designing nanostructured microspheres with well-defined outlines by mixing carboxyl-functionalized amylose and magnetite via ultrasound

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 456-463

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.044

关键词

Drug delivery systems; Ultrasound-induced emulsion; Magnetic polymers; Microspheres; Nanocomposites; Synthesis

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Tecnologico (CNPq-Brazil)
  2. CNPq
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES-Brasil)
  4. Instituto de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao em Materiais Complexos Funcionais (INOMAT)
  5. Fundacao Araucaria-Brasil
  6. CAPES/PNPD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetite-nanostructured amylose (AMY) microspheres with well-defined outlines were developed through an ultrasound-induced hydroalcoholic emulsion in 30s. The formation of sphere-shaped polysaccharide particles occurred, upon ultrasound, via a complexation of iron ions from magnetite with carboxyl groups from carboxylated AMY at the interior of the benzyl alcohol-confined water droplets, within which the polysaccharide chains would have been fine-tuned. The introduction of magnetite into the microspheres under ultrasonic irradiation produced sub-1.78 mu m size spheres and also rendered a narrower sphere size distribution. Spherical crystalline structures of magnetite with diameters ranging from 28 nm to 140 nm were observed in the AMY microspheres, indicating an excellent dispersion of the iron oxides if compared to its initial diameter (<5 mu m). We supposed that both the strong interactions resultant from complexation of iron ions with carboxyl groups and the ultrasound waves have effectively contributed to disaggregate magnetic particles, dispersing them into smaller crystals. This work offers a self-healing, readily synthesized, friendly environmentally device that can be used in important fields of the health science and material technology. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据