4.3 Article

Exploring spatial trends and causes in Lake Ontario coastal chemistry: Nutrients and pigments

期刊

JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 794-800

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.04.011

关键词

Nearshore; Lake Ontario; Nutrients; Phytoplankton

资金

  1. USGS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ordination approach integrating chemical water quality and biological parameters proved to be an effective method that identified six regional clusters of differing water quality in the nearshore of Lake Ontario. This approach allows for an evaluation of potential factors that contribute to the water quality observed. Creeks and rivers with high dissolved nutrients, low suspended solids, and low biological production as chlorophyll were included in Cluster 1, while Cluster 2 included four bays associated with eutrophic conditions. The shoreside sites along the south shore of Lake Ontario (Cluster 3) had high total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll, and phycocyanin relative to the offshore and moderate P limitation, suggesting that any P entering these systems from tributaries will stimulate phytoplankton and benthic algal growth. Long Pond and the Genesee River shoreside (Cluster 4) had elevated TP, total suspended solids, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen and high chlorophyll and phycocyanin concentrations. In general, offshore waters and the eastern nearshore and embayments of Lake Ontario (Clusters 5 and 6) had relatively low P, N, chlorophyll, and phycocyanin levels and were the most severely limited for P (N/P = molar ratio 82). Phosphorus loads to embayments and perhaps to the nearshore may be creating regional areas where N-limitation is likely, which tends to favor the growth of Cyanobacteria and may be associated with hepatotoxin production. From a management perspective, such analyses identify regions stressed by nutrients and provide possible causal relationships enabling the targeting of regions of the lake and its watershed for remediation. (C) 2015 International Association for Great Lakes Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据