4.7 Article

Fabrication and electrochemical treatment application of a microstructured TiO2-NTs/Sb-SnO2/PbO2 anode in the degradation of CI Reactive Blue 194 (RB 194)

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 86-93

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.089

关键词

TiO2-NTs/Sb-SnO2/PbO2; Reactive Blue 194; Azo dye; Electrochemical oxidation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51008154]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [SBK201022682]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090091120007]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [1112021101]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Nanjing University [2010CL07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A microstructured Sb-doped SnO2/PbO2 electrode was synthesized and investigated for the treatment of C.I. Reactive Blue 194 (RB 194) in aqueous solution. An electrochemical method was employed for the electrodeposition of PbO2 on an ordered microstructured TiO2-NTs template to obtain a large specific surface area and high space utilization. The TiO2-NTs/Sb-SnO2/PbO2 electrode was characterized by XRD, SEM and cyclic voltammetry and the results showed that the predominant phase of the lead dioxide anode is beta-PbO2. The decolorization and mineralization of dye RB 194 was investigated by UV-vis measurements and TOC analysis. The removal efficiency was studied as a function of several operation variables, such as current densities, initial dye concentration, initial pH values and chloride ions. It was found that the TiO2-NTs/Sb-SnO2/PbO2 electrode exhibited good decolorization and mineralization capability of RB 194 in neutral conditions at a current density of 150 mA/cm(2), with an initial dye concentration of 30 mg/L. On the basis of the reaction products identified, a possible degradation pathway for the anodic oxidation of non-biodegradable organic dye RB 194 in aqueous solution is proposed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据