4.7 Article

Efficient catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol at moderate temperature using a high-load supported copper catalyst

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 426-434

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.103

关键词

CWPO; Phenol oxidation; CuO/Al2O3; Hydrogen peroxide

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
  3. CONICET (Argentina)
  4. AECID [A/9419/07, A/017018/08]
  5. AUIP
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  7. FEDER [CTM2008-03338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent in the presence of a catalyst (Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation, CWPO) has emerged as a clean and effective alternative among other catalytic oxidation processes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the CWPO of phenol solutions using a high-load CuO/Al2O3 catalyst, which allows maintaining a high activity and efficiency compared to homogeneous copper, also overcoming secondary effluent contamination. The catalytic oxidation of aqueous phenol solutions using H2O2 as oxidizing agent and a home-made CuO/Al2O3 catalyst was studied in a batchwise slurry reactor. The applied H2O2:phenol molar ratio was only nearly 30% higher than the stoichiometric ratio. Experiments were performed at temperatures between 303 and 343 K using different catalyst loads. Phenol disappearance and TOC reduction were monitored throughout the reaction time. Both phenol and TOC conversions were larger as temperature and catalyst load increased, following the higher hydrogen peroxide decomposition rates achieved. At the highest catalyst load and temperature, complete phenol conversion and ca. 80% TOC removal was achieved. Catalyst performance in terms of phenol and TOC disappearance was maintained after 12 h of usage. Although there is evidence of some copper leaching from the catalyst, the homogeneous contribution to the overall activity is marginal. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据