4.7 Article

Exergy and environmental impact assessment of solar photoreactors for catalytic hydrogen production

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 330-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.018

关键词

Hydrogen production; Photo-catalysis; Continuous operation; Scale-up; Exergy; CO2 emission

资金

  1. Phoenix Canada Oil Company Ltd.
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a new photo-catalytic energy conversion system is analyzed for continuous production of hydrogen at a pilot-plant scale. Two methods of photo-catalytic water splitting and solar methanol steam reforming are investigated as two potential solar-based methods of catalytic hydrogen production. The exergy efficiency, exergy destruction, environmental impact and sustainability index are investigated for these systems, as well as exergoenvironmental analyses. A Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CPC) is presented for the sunlight-driven hydrogen production system. This study shows that an optimum water flow rate exists, where the exergy efficiency of the photo-catalytic hydrogen production is maximized. The amount of CO2 emissions that are reduced by this process increases at higher flow rates. The light intensity is one of the key parameters in design optimization of the photo-reactors, in conjunction with light absorptivity of the catalyst. The results show that a trade-off exists in terms of exergy efficiency improvement and CO2 emissions of the photo catalytic hydrogen production system. The optimal working condition of solar methanol reforming to satisfy the exergy-environmental considerations is found to be light intensity range of 530W m(-2) < J < 600W m(-2) and water-methanol mole ratio of 1.5-2. An optimum methanol feeding rate associated with CO2 emissions of methanol steam reforming is determined in order to establish the required solar flux for photo-catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrogen.(C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据