4.7 Article

Tetracycline removal from waters by integrated technologies based on ozonation and biodegradation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 115-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.023

关键词

Tetracyclines; Integrated technologies; Ozonation; Biodegradation

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia [RNM3823]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2011-29035-C02-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of ozone and of technologies based on the simultaneous use of ozone-hydrogen peroxide, ozone-activated carbon, and ozone-biological treatment in the removal of tetracyclines (TCs) from waters. The results obtained shown, regardless of the TC under study, TC degradation was complete after 10 min of ozonation. A slight decrease in total organic carbon (TOC) and medium toxicity was observed with longer TC ozonation treatment time. The presence of H(2)O(2) during TC zonation considerably increases the TC removal rate. Moreover, the O(3)/H(2)O(2) system had adequate oxidizing capacity to mineralize a high fraction of the total organic carbon. The presence of activated carbon during ozonation increases the TC removal rate and also produces a slight decrease in the concentration of TOC and a reduction in the medium toxicity: these effects are explained by: (i) the capacity of the carbon to adsorb TC degradation compounds, which have a smaller molecular size than the original TCs and, especially, (ii) its capacity to transform dissolved ozone into HO. The combined ozone-biological activated sludge system demonstrated a high effectiveness to degrade TCs and mineralize their degradation compounds. These are metabolized by the microorganisms in biological sludge, markedly reducing the TOC, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and biological oxygen demand (BOD); the longer the TC ozonation time before the biological treatment, the greater are these reductions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据