4.7 Article

Chemical recycling of PET by catalyzed glycolysis: Kinetics of the heterogeneous reaction

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 173, 期 1, 页码 210-219

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.031

关键词

Glycolysis; PET; Granulometry; Surface area; Mathematical model; Glycolysis kinetic

资金

  1. CNPq, Brazil [309005/2009-4, 481424/2010-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyethylene terephthalate post-consume (PET-pc) glycolysis was investigated by the use of ethylene glycol (EG) and zinc acetate, as catalyst. It was focused the kinetic aspects through use of mathematical model specially developed for application in this study. The grains-lot was sieved in different size ranges and a relation between surface area and granulometry, surface area and temperature on the conversion and depolymerization rate was proposed. At temperatures ranging 180-190 degrees C the depolymerization rate is quite elevated and almost 100% of conversion is obtained up to 3 or 4 h reaction time. For lower temperatures (170-180 degrees C), equilibrium is achieved and it becomes more important as the temperature is decreased. The conversion profile showed an initial activation stage where the mass transfer between the liquid and solid phases is minimal. The proposed mathematic model was based on these findings and on reaction mechanism that differentiates the reaction sites present in the PET surface. By that model the value of rate constant (k) for each temperature, and the dependence of k with 1/T was calculated. Four our best knowledge it is the first time that a mathematical model considers the activation stage in the earlier times of PET depolymerization reaction. The inputs yielding, time and temperature were included in the used mathematical model that fits very well the experimental data obtained at temperatures higher than 180 degrees C. This model helps to predict the necessary mass of PET for producing a desired amount of products. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据