4.7 Article

Binary biosorption of Acid Red 14 and Reactive Red 15 onto acid treated okara: Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of two dyes using partial least squares regression

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 171, 期 3, 页码 967-975

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.047

关键词

Biosorption; Acid treated okara; Partial least squares regression; Textile dyes; Isotherm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078007]
  2. National University [091000507, 101000514]
  3. Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality [PHR20110819]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [8082007, 8112007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biosorption of Acid Red 14 (AR14) and Reactive Red 15 (RR15) by acid treated okara (ATO) in binary solutions was investigated. To overcome the severe spectral overlapping, partial least squares regression as a multivariate calibration method was successfully developed for the simultaneous determination of AR14 and RR15 in binary solutions. In single solution, the Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm yielded the best fit for the whole concentration range; however, both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm predicted the experimental data well at the different concentration region (100-300 mg/L and 300-500 mg/L). Maximum biosorption capacity obtained from Langmuir isotherm for ARM and RR15 in single solution was 217.39 and 243.90 mg/g, respectively. In binary solutions, antagonistic biosorption occurred and ATO favored to adsorb RR15. Partial competitive Langmuir, Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm for a binary system and extended Freundlich isotherm could all represent the binary equilibrium data well. The FTIR results indicated the main functional groups on ATO for the biosorption would be amine, hydroxyl, carboxyl and either. ATO was proved to be a low-cost and efficient biosorbent for the removal of dyes studied. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据