4.7 Article

Epoxiconazole degradation from artificial wetland and forest buffer substrates under flooded conditions

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 173, 期 3, 页码 760-765

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.044

关键词

Wetland; Forest; Epoxiconazole; Pesticide; Pollution; Degradation

资金

  1. FIRE (Federation Ile-de-France de recherche sur l'environnement) [CNRS FR3020]
  2. ArtWET LIFE [06/ENV/F/000133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential for (14)C-epoxiconazole (EPX) degradation in wetland sediments, wetland plants, forest soil and litter was studied under flooded conditions. Mineralization was slow and low (<4% in 177 days). Two major unidentified metabolites were produced among which one was mainly extracted by methanol and had a retention time close to that of EPX. It was suspected to be of similar form to that of the EPX parent compound. A lag-phase was observed for all substrates and mineralization did not reach a plateau. Water-extractable radioactivity did not exceed 8% of the applied amount along the incubation period except for wetland plants (18.8% at day 177). Recovery of initial (14)C in methanol extracts decreased with incubation time on average from 100 to 76%. Non-extractable residues (NER) increased up to nearly 18% except for wetland plants which were associated with larger fractions of NER (29.8%) at day 177. Plants' fresh organic matter seemed to simultaneously enhance NER formation and maintain a relatively high proportion of desorbable mobile residues. A lag-phase kinetic model was proposed. Estimated dissipation half-lives on wetland sediments were less than 65 days and shorter than those estimated in forest soil, wetland plants and forest litter (89-139 days). Reducing conditions did not appear to be favorable to epoxiconazole mineralization although degradation and NER formation occurred. In field conditions, this slow mineralization rate may be compensated by the temporary aerobic conditions created by water level fluctuations. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据