4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Use of catalytic oxidation and dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons reactions to highlight improvement of heat transfer in catalytic metallic foams

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.064

关键词

Solid catalytic foams; Heat transfer; Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane; Dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane; VOx/TiO2 coated foams; Pt/gamma-Al2O3 coated foams

资金

  1. Agence nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-MILLICAT) [06-BLAN-0216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two model reactions were used to show the influence of catalytic foams on improving heat transfer. The catalytic performances were compared to those observed when using the same reactors packed with catalytic powder or beads. One reaction was the exothermic oxidative dehydrogenation of propane which was investigated on 7%V2O5/TiO2 coated on stainless steel foam. A silica layer was first deposited on the foam surface by Remote Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition to avoid poisoning of active phase by iron species, to favour the anchoring of TiO2 support and to accommodate the difference of dilatation coefficients. When comparing catalytic foams with powders in the same reactor, the selectivity to propene at isoconversion was higher by 12-45 mol% for the same amount and composition (7%V2O5/TiO2) of the active phase and in the same operating conditions (contact time, C-3/O-2 ratio, temperature range). The other reaction was the endothermic dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane on 2%Pt/Al2O3 directly coated on foams and on molecular sieve beads. To study the influence of heat and mass transfers, the material (FeCrAlloy or alumina) and porosity (81-97%) of foams were varied. It was found that, even for highly exothermic or endothermic reactions not limited by external transport, the coated foams significantly increased the effective conductivity of catalytic beds, the denser foam leading to higher effective conductivity. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据