4.7 Article

Further investigations of CO2 capture using triamine-grafted pore-expanded mesoporous silica

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 513-519

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.041

关键词

CO2 capture; Aminosilane grafting; Adsorption capacity; Adsorption selectivity; Adsorbent regeneration

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A promising adsorbent for acid gas removal, referred to as TRI-PE-MCM-41, was produced by grafting a triamine-containing silane on an MCM-41-type mesoporous silica whose pores have been enlarged by post-synthesis hydrothermal treatment in the presence of a pore-expander. The CO2 adsorption capacity was determined gravimetrically, and via column breakthrough measurements. The tolerance of TRI-PE-MCM-41 to moisture in the feed was substantiated by measurements under both equilibrium and dynamic conditions. Using a combination of mass spectrometry and thermogravimetry, it was corroborated that the presence of moisture enhances the CO2 uptake at equilibrium. Adsorption measurements using fixed bed columns showed that moisture does not affect negatively the CO2 working adsorption capacity compared to dry streams. Furthermore, since the material hardly adsorbed any N-2 or O-2, the selectivity for CO2 over N-2 and O-2 was practically infinitely high. Cyclic measurements of pure CO2 and CO2 :N-2 = 10:90 mixture using different regeneration modes shed light on the stability of the material and the influence of adsorption/desorption operating conditions on its performance. It was found that the temperature swing regeneration mode is suitable for desorption above 120 degrees C. while regeneration under temperature-vacuum swing may be attractive at lower desorption temperatures. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据