4.7 Article

Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on high surface area activated carbon modified by N-2, H-2 and ammonia

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 571-577

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.070

关键词

High surface area activated carbon (AC); Surface modification; Microwave irradiation; Ammonia solution impregnation; CO2 adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20936001]
  2. Science & Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activated carbons (ACs) with high surface area were modified separately by using ammonia aqueous solution impregnation and microwave irradiation in an atmosphere of N-2 or H-2 in order to improve their adsorption properties toward CO2. The modified ACs were characterized, and the surface chemical properties of the ACs were determined separately by FTIR, Boehm titration and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) methods. The isotherms of CO2 on the modified ACs were measured. Results showed that after surface modification, the contents of elements C and N of the samples increased, while that of the element O of the samples decreased in comparison with the original AC. Correspondingly, the amounts of the surface basic groups of the modified ACs increased, while those of the surface acidic groups decreased as compared to the original AC. The use of microwave irradiation in an atmosphere of N-2 to modify the carbon can make the total basic groups of the surfaces of the ACs be the highest among the modified ACs. As a consequence of that, the modified AC samples had higher adsorption capacities of CO2 than the original AC, and the more the surface basic groups of the ACs, the higher the adsorption capacity of the ACs for CO2. The amount adsorbed of CO2 on the modified AC by the microwave irradiation in the atmosphere of N-2 was up to 3.75 mmol/g at 1 atm and 293 K, having an increase of 28% in comparison with the original AC. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据