4.7 Article

Color removal from water-based ink wastewater by bagasse fly ash, sawdust fly ash and activated carbon

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 503-508

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.051

关键词

Bagasse fly ash; Sawdust fly ash; Water-based ink; Activated carbon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bagasse fly ash (BGFA), sawdust fly ash (SDFA) and activated carbon (AC) were investigated for color removal from wastewater from the printing ink industry after coagulation of water-based ink wastewater. Synthetic water-based ink was used to study the adsorption isotherm. The maximum adsorption capacity of BGFA increased with temperatures, having values of 7.30, 12.67, 21.60 and 29.07 mg g(-1) at 30, 40, 50 and 60 degrees C, respectively. At 30 degrees C the maximum adsorption capacity of BGFA increased from 7.30 to 14.34 mg g(-1) when using water-washed BGFA. The Langmuir, Freundlich and Redlich-Peterson models were all able to explain the color removal of synthetic water-based ink by BGFA, water-washed SDFA (SDFA/W) and AC, whereas R-2 of these three models by SOFA was not high. It might be due to color removal by SOFA involved both precipitation and adsorption of the ink, whereas only adsorption was involved by SDFA/W, BGFA and AC. The synthetic water-based ink adsorption capacity at 30 degrees C was ranked as SDFA > AC > SDFA/W > BGFA with values of 85.47, 40.49, 30.21 and 7.30 mg g(-1), respectively. The efficiencies of BGFA. SOFA and AC for color removal from wastewater from printing ink industry after water-based ink coagulation showed that color removal by SOFA (90%) was higher than commercial AC (80%), SDFA/W (76%) and BGFA (68%), respectively at the same dosage of 0.3% (w/v). The system pH was increased from 1.7 to around neutral by SDFA, while the system pH of AC, SDFA/W and BGFA was still low (pH similar to 2-3). However, SDFA and BGFA had potential as alternative low-cost adsorbents for color removal of water-based ink wastewater from the printing ink industry. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据