4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of carbon-modified titania photocatalysts with a hierarchical meso-/macroporous structure

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 370-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.011

关键词

Meso-/macroporous; Carbon-modified; Titania; Solar photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20803017, 20973096]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB623502]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20070055014]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [08JCZDJC21500]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0215]
  6. Nankai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon-modified TiO2 photocatalysts with a hierarchical meso-/macroporous structure were prepared through direct hydrolyzation of n-tetrabutyl titanate in the dodecylamine solution and subsequent calcination under nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, nitrogen sorption analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and UV-vis spectroscopy. A well-defined hierarchical macrochannel-like structure of mesoporous nanoparticle assembly with a predominant anatase phase was observed in the synthesized carbon-modified titania materials, exhibiting obviously high absorption in the wavelength range of 400-800 nm. It is revealed that carbon could not only substitute partly Ti in the form of Ti-O-C bond but also substitute 0 in the form of O-Ti-C, besides amorphous interstitial carbon atoms were synchronously introduced, benefitting the improvement of solar light photocatalytic activity. The synthesized hierarchical carbon-modified titanias materials exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance in the photodegradation of Rhodamine B dye, suggesting their promising potential as effective solar photocatalysts for organic waste degradation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据