4.7 Article

Complementary imaging of oil recovery mechanisms in fractured reservoirs

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 158, 期 1, 页码 32-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.049

关键词

Enhanced oil recovery; Wettability; MRI; NTI; Fractured reservoirs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complementary imaging techniques used to study enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes in fractured oil reservoirs have provided new and improved fundamental understanding of how oil recovery is affected by fractures. The combination of two imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear tracer imaging (NTI) enables a complementary investigation on materials and processes, where large scale (similar to m) phenomena are controlled by small scale (mu m) heterogeneities. MRI provides high spatial resolution and fast data acquisition necessary to capture the processes that occur inside fractures less than 1 mm wide, while NTI provides information on macro-scale saturation distribution in larger fractured systems. The oil recovery mechanisms involved with waterflooding fractured chalk blocks were found to be dependent on the wettability of the chalk, as the wettability had great impact on the fracture/matrix hydrocarbon exchange. The MRI images of oil saturation development inside the fractures clearly revealed two distinct transport mechanisms for the wetting phase across the fracture at several wettability conditions, and provided new and detailed information on fluid fracture crossing previously observed in block scale experiments investigated by NTI. The ability to obtain rapid (similar to s) 1D saturation profiles, high spatial resolution 2D images (sagital, transverse and coronal) within minutes and detailed 3D images within a couple of hours, makes MRI a powerful tool in studies of multiphase flow in fractured porous rocks, and provides excellent dynamic information of enhanced oil recovery efforts. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据