4.7 Article

Measurements and correlation of viscosities and conductivities for the mixtures of imidazolium ionic liquids with molecular solutes

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 147, 期 1, 页码 27-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.013

关键词

Ionic liquids; Viscosity; Conductivity; Correlation equations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20573034]
  2. National Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20060476003]
  3. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids have potentials as green materials in a variety of fields. it is the case that in their application in industry, ionic liquids are often used together with molecular solutes/solvents. In this paper, systematical measurements of viscosities and conductivities for the binary and quasi-binary mixtures of ionic liquids with molecular solutes were performed over the whole concentration range. The variation tendency of viscosities/conductivities with composition of the mixtures was explained through the disruption of molecular solutes to ionic association or aggregation of the ionic liquids. A exponential equation with empirical parameter A suggested initially by Seddon et al. was used to describe the dependence of viscosities on the mole fraction of molecular solutes, and the physical meaning of A was analyzed based on a theoretical equation deduced from rate process theory. At the same time, another exponential equation with parameter C was proposed to correlate the experimental date of the product of conductivity and viscosity. and satisfactory results were obtained over the entire range of concentration. The main factors affecting the parameter C were discussed. It is expected that the new data and correlation equations reported in this work will be useful for the application of ionic liquids in chemical industry. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据