4.7 Article

Pervaporation dehydration of C2-C4 alcohols by 6FDA-ODA-NDA/Ultem® dual-layer hollow fiber membranes with enhanced separation performance and swelling resistance

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 736-743

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.015

关键词

Dual-layer hollow fiber membranes; Pervaporation; Alcohol dehydration; Separation factor; Flux

资金

  1. NUS [R-398-000-044-305, 092 139 0033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel copoly(4,4'-diphenyleneoxide/1,5-napthalene-2,2'-bis (3,4-dicarboxyl phenyl) hexa fluoro propane diimide) 6FDA-ODA-NDA/Ultem (R) 1010 dual-layer hollow fiber membrane for pervaporation dehydration has been fabricated via co-extrusion process. Not only can it achieve impressive alcohol dehydration performance without any post-treatment but also it particularly minimizes the membrane's swelling behavior towards aqueous alcohol solution. For isopropanol, n-butanol and t-butanol dehydrations of 85/15 (alcohol/water) wt.% feed solutions, the 6FDA-ODA-NDA/Ultem (R) 1010 dual-layer hollow fiber membrane can successfully attain permeate containing more than 99.7 wt.% water with considerably high flux which implies to a distinctive separation factor of the respective alcohol system. The outstanding dehydration performance of 6FDA-ODA-NDA/Ultem (R) 1010 dual-layer hollow fiber membranes on various aqueous alcohol feeds can be attributed to: (1) a precise formulation of the outer-and inner-layer dope compositions; (2) the size of d-space created in the outer-layer is a good match for size exclusion mechanism in the alcohol dehydration systems; (3) a relatively low water uptake and less swelling characteristics of the Ultem (R) 1010 polyimide as a supporting layer. By adjusting spinning parameters, i.e. outer-layer dope flow rate and air gap distance, the separation performance of 6FDA-ODA-NDA/Ultem (R) 1010 dual-layer hollow fiber membranes can be further improved. (C) 2009 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据