4.7 Article

Plasma surface modification of polypropylene microfiltration membranes and fouling by BSA dispersion

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 145, 期 2, 页码 218-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.007

关键词

Antifouling characteristics; Low temperature NH3 plasma treatment; Polypropylene microfiltration membrane; Surface modification

资金

  1. Science and Technological Fund of Anhui Province for Outstanding Youth [04046065]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [20871003]
  3. Education Department of Anhui province [2006 KJ 006 TD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fouling is the major obstacle in membrane processes applied in protein filtration. To overcome the problem, the polypropylene microfiltration membranes (PPMMs) were surface-modified by low temperature NH3 plasma treatment. Structural and morphological changes on the membrane surface were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The change of surface wettability was monitored by contact angle measurements. The pore size and distribution were evaluated by mercury porosimetry. The static water contact angle of the modified membrane reduced obviously. The relative pure water flux of the modified membranes had a maximal value for the plasma treatment time of 1 min. To assess the relation between the plasma treatment and the membrane fouling by bovine serum albumin (BSA), the filtration and the adsorption of BSA experiments were carried out. It was found that the surface modified membranes showed better regeneration performances, i.e. higher flux recoveries after water and caustic cleaning than those of the nascent PPMM. Flux recoveries after water and caustic cleaning for the NH3 plasma treated PPMM for 1 min were 51.1 and 60.7%, respectively higher than those of the virgin membrane. The results demonstrated that the bovine Serum albumin adsorption was suppressed significantly by plasma surface modification. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据