4.7 Article

Effect of initial pH and supporting electrolyte on the treatment of water containing high concentration of humic substances by electrocoagulation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 138, 期 1-3, 页码 63-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.029

关键词

electrocoagulation; supporting electrolyte; humic substances; aluminum electrode; drinking water

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effects of supporting electrolyte type and concentration were investigated on the batch removal of water with high concentration of natural organic matter (NOM) by the electrocoagulation method using plate electrodes. It was observed that the addition of supporting electrolyte has a twofold effect which can be summarized as follows: firstly increasing the ionic strength of the water causing compression of the double-layer and secondly raising the electrical conductivity of the water causing more current passing through the circuit under the same applied potential. It was observed that the concentration of 5 mM supporting electrolyte was optimum up to 100 mg/L of NOM, while concentration of 10 mM is more favorable for higher concentrations than 100 mg/L of NOM. In order to determine the most favorable supporting electrolyte type, NaCl, Na2SO4 and NaNO3 were used as supporting electrolyte in the test runs. Under the conditions of initial pH of the solution equal to 5.0 and initial concentration of 100 mg/L NOM, charge loadings were within the range of 2.0934-3.7437 F/m(3) for Na2SO4 and NaCl, respectively. Additionally at the same initial conditions for a treatment period of 9 min specific energy consumptions and removal efficiencies were ranged between the 4.747 and 9.695 kWh/m(3), and between 96.84% and 99.64% for Na2SO4 and NaCl, respectively. Availability of the chloride (Cl-) ions in the water can cause formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) which are suspected carcinogenic compounds. It can be said that the most favorable supporting electrolyte type is Na2SO4 for this treatment technique. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据