4.7 Article

Hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) over mesoporous nickel-alumina xerogel catalysts: Effect of nickel content

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 141, 期 1-3, 页码 298-304

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.001

关键词

mesoporous nickel-alumina xerogel catalyst; sol-gel method; liquefied natural gas; steam reforming; hydrogen production

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [2005-N-FC14-P-04] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [R11-2002-102-01002-0, 과C6A1903, R11-2002-102-01001-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous nickel-alumina xerogel (XNiAl) catalysts with various nickel contents were prepared by a single-step sol-gel method for use in hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The effect of nickel content on the catalytic performance of XNiAl catalysts was investigated. Nickel species were finely dispersed in the XNiAl catalysts through the formation of Ni-O-Al composite structure. The XNiAl catalysts served as efficient catalysts in the hydrogen production by steam reforming of LNG. Both LNG conversion and H-2 composition in dry gas showed volcano-shaped curves with respect to nickel content. Thus, optimal nickel content was required for maximum catalytic performance. The performance of XNiAl catalysts in the steam reforming of LNG increased with increasing reducibility of the catalyst. Among the catalysts examined, the 30NiAl (30 wt% Ni) catalyst with the highest reducibility showed the best catalytic performance. The highest surface area and the largest pore volume of the 30NiAl (30 wt% Ni) catalyst were also partly responsible for its superior catalytic performance. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据