4.7 Article

Effects of the operating parameters on the production of bio-oil in the fast pyrolysis of Japanese larch

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 143, 期 1-3, 页码 124-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.12.031

关键词

kinetics; fast pyrolysis; Japanese larch; char removal system; pyrolysis conditions

资金

  1. Ministry of Environment in Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵C6A1301] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Study examined the kinetics of the pyrolysis of Japanese larch using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and fast pyrolysis with a bubbling fluidized bed reactor and a two-staged char removal system under various reaction conditions. The effects of the reaction conditions on the chemical and physical characteristics of bio-oil were also examined. Japanese larch was decomposed at temperatures ranging from 250 to 380 degrees C. The apparent activation energies ranged from 220 and 1009 kJ mol(-1) when the pyrolytic conversion increased from 5 to 95%. The optimal reaction temperature for the production of bio-oil was 450 degrees C. The bio-oil yield decreased with decreasing feed size due to overheating. The bio-oil yields increased gradually with increasing flow rate and feeding rate but these increases were not significant. The use of the product gas as the fluidizing medium was effective for the production of bio-oil, giving the highest bio-oil yield of 64 wt%, but the introduction of oxygen had a slightly negative effect on the bio-oil yield. In addition, high-quality bio-oil, which contains < 0.005 wt% solid, no ash, and low concentrations of alkali and alkaline earth metals, could be produced using the two-staged char removal system. With the exception of the reaction temperature and partial oxidation, the other pyrolysis conditions did not significantly affect the chemical and physical characteristics of bio-oil. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据