4.4 Article

A Scalable Preparation Method for SILP and SCILL Ionic Liquid Thin-Film Materials

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 1962-1967

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201200210

关键词

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; Film formation; Fluidized bed; Supported ionic liquid phase; Surface coating

资金

  1. German Research Council (DFG) within the framework of its Excellence Initiative supports the Cluster of Excellence Engineering of Advanced Materials at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
  2. Bavarian-Californian Technology Network (BaCaTec)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) catalysts consist of a homogeneous catalyst that is dissolved in an ionic liquid and dispersed on a porous support material. This immobilization technique yields solid catalysts that can be applied in continuous gas phase processes. Recently, several successful applications have been presented that could possibly lead to a commercialization of this promising class of novel materials. The state-of-the-art preparation method uses an incipient wetness-type impregnation of the support material by a solution of catalyst, ionic liquid, and a helper solvent, followed by subsequent removal of the helper solvent in vacuo. Typically, this removal is carried out in a rotary evaporator, thus being limited in batch size. Similarly, the so-called supported catalysts with ionic liquid layer (SCILL) consist of an ionic liquid layer on top of a traditional heterogeneous catalyst, which can be prepared in a similar way. In this work, a novel preparation method for SILP catalysts is presented that is scalable for larger batches, as required for industrial use. Different types of support materials such as powders, spheres, agglomerates, and extrudates were successfully impregnated by the novel fluidized-bed impregnation method and the distribution of the ionic liquid and catalyst was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据