4.6 Article

Empirical equations to describe trace element behaviors due to rock weathering in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 110-117

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.02.004

关键词

Weathering index of granite (WIG); Empirical equations; Geochemical backgrounds; Trace element behaviors

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41230311]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2011BAB04B09]
  3. China Geology Survey [1212011120950, 1212011121039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To describe element behavior due to rock weathering, Gong et al. (2013) presented a new Weathering Index of Granite (WIG) and fitted exponential equations between trace element contents and WIG values. Five new regolith profiles developed over igneous rocks and phyllite in China are investigated along with nine other reported regolith profiles formed on multiple rocks in China to investigate the quantitative relationship between trace element contents and chemical indices of weathering. Three weathering indices of WIG, Al2O3/Ti, and K2O/SiO2 are used to quantitatively describe trace element behaviors due to rock weathering. On the basis of 13 regolith profiles developed over igneous rocks, phyllite, schist, and carbonate rocks, the equation is presented as Ig(c) = A*(1.2 WIG/100) + B*Ig(Al2O3/Ti) + C*Ig(K2O/SiO2) + D where c is the content of trace element in ng/g for Cd, Hg and mu g/g for others, the content unit of Al2O3, K2O, SiO2 is weight % and the unit of Ti content is mu g/g, and A, B, C, D are the fitted parameters. Empirical equations for 27 trace elements are regressed with well statistical significance, and the WIG value is limited to less than 120, SiO2 content is in the range of 14% to 80%, and the value of 10,000 x Al2O3/Ti varies from ca. 8 to 160. These empirical equations have an important potential application on determining geochemical backgrounds of trace elements. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据