4.7 Article

The influence of mucus on copper speciation in the gill microenvironment of carp (Cyprinus carpio)

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 59-64

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2000.1932

关键词

fish; gill; microenvironment; mucus; copper, speciation; complexation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

pH and mucus (as total organic carbon) in the gill microenvironment of carp, Cyprinus carpio,exposed to various concentrations of total copper were measured in an exposure experiment using Playle's apparatus. The activities of free copper ions in both inspired and expired waters were determined using a copper ion selective electrode. A trial-and-error procedure of coupling species distribution calculations (MINEQA2) with single-site complexation modeling (mucus-copper) Was proposed for computation of both copper speciation and complexation capacity of gill mucus for copper in an interactive loop. The method was demonstrated to be valid in calculating the metal speciation in this study. It was found that pH and alkalinity in the gill microenvironment were slightly higher than in the surrounding water of pH 6.7. The Fates of excretion of CO2, HCO3-, and mucus at the gills increased, either linearly or nonlinearly with increases in the total copper concentration in the surrounding water. The conditional complexation stability constant of the mucus was;calculated as log k = 5.32, while the complexation stability equivalent concentration of the mucus was derived as 0.95 mmol Cu/mg C. As a consequence of changes in pH and alkalinity, in conjunction with occurrence of mucus, copper speciation in the gill microenvironment:is significantly different from that in the surrounding water, with 3-20% of the copper complexed by the gill mucus. The sequence of species domination also shifted from CuCO30, Cu2+, CuHCO3+, and Cu(OH)(2)(0) in the surrounding water to CuCO30, Cu2+, Cu(OH)(2)(0), CuHCO3+, and mucus-Cu,in the gill microenvironment. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据