4.6 Article

Compact linear Fresnel reflector solar thermal powerplants

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 263-283

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(99)00068-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluates Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector (CLFR) concepts suitable for large scale solar thermal electricity generation plants. in the CLFR, it is assumed that there will be many parallel linear receivers elevated on tower structures that are close enough for individual mirror rows to have the option of directing reflected solar radiation to two alternative linear receivers on separate towers. This additional variable in reflector orientation provides the means for much more densely packed arrays. Patterns of alternating mirror inclination can be set up such that shading and blocking are almost eliminated while ground coverage is maximised. Preferred designs would also use secondary optics which will reduce tower height requirements. The avoidance of large mirror row spacings and receiver heights is an important cost issue in determining the cost of ground preparation, array substructure cost, tower structure cost, steam line thermal losses, and steam line cost. The improved ability to use the Fresnel approach delivers the traditional benefits of such a system, namely small reflector size, low structural cast, fixed receiver position without moving joints, and noncylindrical receiver geometry. The modelled array also uses low emittance all-glass evacuated Dewar tubes as the receiver elements. Alternative versions of the basic CLFR concept that are evaluated include absorber orientation, absorber structure, the use of secondary reflectors adjacent to the absorbers, reflector field configurations, mirror packing densities, and receiver heights. A necessary requirement in this activity was the development of specific raytrace and thermal models to simulate the new concepts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据