4.4 Article

Aminopeptidase A expression in cervical neoplasia and its relationship to neoplastic transformation and progression

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 342-352

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000012122

关键词

aminopeptidase A; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cervical cancer; angiotensin II; immunohistochemistry

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aminopeptidase A (AP-A) is a cell surface metallopeptidase which specifically cleaves the amino-terminal acidic residue from peptide substrates such as angiotensin II. AP-A is identical to the differentiation-related antigen, murine BP-1 or human kidney gp160, and is involved in regulating cell differentiation and/or neoplastic transformation of certain normal and transformed cells. We examined expression of AP-A in premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix, and investigated whether its expression was related to disease progression and neoplastic transformation. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections including 14 cervical intraepithelial neoplasms (CIN) and 23 invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) were immunohistochemically evaluated. AP-A was localized in the basal cell layer in normal squamous epithelium. In GIN, AP-A expression was found on dysplastic cells, and increased with the severity of the precancerous lesions. In invasive cancer, 18 of 19 non-keratinizing-type SCCs and none of 4 kera- tinizing-type SCCs expressed AP-A. In addition, AP-A immunoreactivity was significantly correlated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in both CIN and SCC cases. Furthermore, angiotensin II type 1 receptor was present in all AP-A-positive SCCs. These results indicate that AP-A is upregulated as the lesion progresses toward carcinoma in the cervical epithelium, and suggest that AP-A may play a regulatory role in neoplastic transformation and disease progression in cervical neoplasms and may serve as a potential tumor marker during cervical neoplasia development. Copyright(C)2000S.KargerAG,Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据