4.2 Article

Crystal chemistry of perovskite-type compounds in the tausonite-loparite series, (Sr1-2xNaxLax)TiO3

期刊

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF MINERALS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 583-589

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002690000103

关键词

perovskite; loparite; tausonite; structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite-type compounds in the series tausonite-loparite, (Sr1-2xNaxLax)TiO3, were synthesized by solid-state reaction (final heating at 1200-1300 degrees C), and studied using conventional and synchrotron X-ray powder diffractometry. The structures of intermediate compositions were determined using the Rietveld profile refinement method. In the compositional range 0 less than or equal to x less than or equal to 0.1, the series comprises perovskites characterized by an undistorted cubic structure (space group Pm (3) over bar m, a approximate to 3.905 3.902 Angstrom, Z = 1). Intermediate compounds in the range 0.15 less than or equal to x less than or equal to 0.35 crystallize with tetragonal symmetry (I4/mcm, a approximate to root 2a(p), c approximate to root 2a(p), Z = 4) derived from the cubic aristotype by antiphase rotation of the TiO6 octahedra about a fourfold axis. The angle of rotation estimated from the positional parameters of oxygen atoms ranges from 2.5(7)degrees to 5.5(4)degrees. The cubic-to-tetragonal transition arises from substitution of Sr2+ by the comparatively smaller Na1+ and La3+ cations. A further transition from the tetragonal to rhombohedral symmetry (R (3) over bar c, a approximate to root 2a(p), c approximate to 2 root 3a(p), Z = 6) occurs between x = 0.35 and 0.40, and apparently does not involve formation of perovskite with an intermediate two-tilt structure (Imma). The rhombohedral structure is characterized by a multicomponent octahedral tilt about a threefold axis ranging in magnitude from 6.5(2)degrees to 7.7(2)degrees. In the series (Sr1-2xNaxLax)TiO3, the unit-cell dimensions decrease, and the degree of structural distortion increases with x.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据