4.4 Article

Relationship between covalently bound ceramides and transepidermal water loss (TEWL)

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 292, 期 9, 页码 463-468

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004030000160

关键词

covalently bound ceramides; TEWL; lamellar; UVB; EFAD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stratum corneum, which is the outermost layer of the skin, functions as an important barrier to maintain biological homeostasis. The multilamellar structures formed by intercellular lipids present in the stratum corneum are considered to play an important role in barrier function. Most intercellular lipids are unbound and can be extracted by organic solvents, but some intercellular lipids are covalently bound to cornified envelope proteins. Decreases in unbound lipid levels reduce the barrier function of the stratum corneum, but the relationship between bound lipid and the barrier function of the stratum corneum is not well understood. In this study, we examined the relationship between the amount of covalently bound ceramide, the main bound lipid, and the barrier function of the stratum corneum, A single dose of UVB irradiation (2 x MED), or continuous UVB irradiation (0.5 x MED/day for 14 days) to the back, or feeding with an essential fatty acid-deficient (EFAD) diet for 8 weeks caused a significant elevation of TEWL and a significant reduction in covalently bound ceramides in hairless rats. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the intercellular multilamellar structures in the stratum corneum of treated rats were incomplete (folding, defects, unclear images) compared to the structures seen in the stratum corneum of non-UVB-irradiated and non-EFAD rats. These results suggest that the amount of covalently bound ceramides is highly correlated with the barrier function of the skin, and that covalently bound ceramides play an important role in the formation of lamellar structures, and are involved in the maintenance of the barrier function of the skin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据