3.8 Article

An integrated microstructural, sensory and instrumental approach to describe potato texture

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/fstl.2000.0688

关键词

potato microstructure; image analysis; texture; sensory analysis; multivariate data analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method was developed to objectively measure a range of microstructural features in thin sections of raw, and cooked potatoes using light microscopy and semi-automatic digital image analysis. Scanning electron microscopy was employed for qualitative visualization of the texture showing the degree of cell adhesion and cell wall softening. Sensory texture analysis and uniaxial compression tests were toed to determine the textural properties of cooked potato samples. Six conventionally and two organically grown potato cultivars were used in the study. Eight image features grouped the potato cultivar. With respect to three different structural qualities by principal component analysis. The most important structural differences between potatoes is characterized as a contrast between potatoes having a low volume fraction of cell walls (large cells), a small number of cells and starch grains, and large numbers of elongated cells. Another type of variation in the structural data grouped the potato cultivars with respect to volume fraction of starch grains, volume function of galatinized starch, and formfactor of cells. The volume fraction of raw and cooked starch and the formfactor of cells were significantly lowered during storage. Image features were correlated with sensory and textural properties using multivariate data analysis (Partial Least Square Regression). Volume fraction of raw starch, volume fraction of gelatinized starch, and dry matter content were found to be highly correlated with sensory geometrical qualities.,Mechanical sensory properties were found to be more correlated with a uniaxial compression measure (stress at fracture) than was the image data. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据