4.6 Article

Maternal prepregnant body mass and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 275-286

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033452

关键词

prenatal risk factors; maternal body mass index; birth cohort

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [Z01MH002704, R01MH053147, Z01MH002763] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01-MH-53147] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the relation between maternal prepregnant body mass index (BMI) and development of schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adult offspring from the Prenatal Determinants of Schizophrenia Study, The study drew on a previously studied cohort of births occurring between 1959 and 1967 to women enrolled in a prepaid health plan. Computerized treatment registries were used to identify possible cases of schizophrenia and spectrum disorders in adult offspring belonging to the health plan from 1981 to 1997, Diagnostic interviews and medical record reviews resulted in diagnosis of 63 cases of schizophrenia and spectrum disorders; these cases and 6,570 unrelated and unaffected cohort members whose mothers also had prepregnancy measures of BMI comprised the sample for analyses. High (greater than or equal to 30.0), compared with average (20.0-26.9), maternal prepregnant BMI (kg/m(2)) was significantly associated with schizophrenia and spectrum disorders in the adult offspring (relative risk [RR] = 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-6.6), independently of maternal age, parity, race, education, or cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Low (less than or equal to 19.9) maternal BMI was not associated with schizophrenia and spectrum disorders (RR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.64-2.2), Future studies of this cohort will examine factors that may help explain the relationship of high maternal prepregnant BMI with schizophrenia, including nutritional and metabolic factors, toxic exposures, and obstetrical complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据