4.4 Article

Identification and characterization of a novel geminivirus with a monopartite genome infecting apple trees

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 2411-2420

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.000173

关键词

-

资金

  1. Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-31]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203076, 200903004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471747, 31371911]
  4. Ministero dell'Economia e Finanze Italiano [Legge 191/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel circular DNA virus sequence has been identified through next-generation sequencing and in silico assembly of small RNAs of 21-24 nt from an apple tree grown in China. The virus genome was cloned using two independent approaches and sequenced. With a size of 2932 nt, it showed the same genomic structure and conserved origin of replication reported for members of the family Geminiviridae. However, the low nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity with known geminiviruses indicated that it was a novel virus, for which the provisional name apple geminivirus (AGV) is proposed. Rolling circle amplification followed by RFLP analyses indicated that AGV was a virus with a monopartite DNA genome. This result was in line with bioassays showing that the cloned viral genome was infectious in several herbaceous plants (Nicotiana bethamiana, Nicotiana glutinosa and Solanum lycopersicum), thus confirming it was complete and biologically active, although no symptoms were observed in these experimental hosts. AGV genome structure and phylogenetic analyses did not support the inclusion of this novel species in any of the established genera in the family Geminiviridae. A survey of 165 apple trees grown in four Chinese provinces showed a prevalence of 7.2 % for AGV, confirming its presence in several cultivars and geographical areas in China, although no obvious relationship between virus infection and specific symptoms was found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据