4.3 Article

Coevolution at multiple spatial scales: Linum marginale-Melampsora lini - from the individual to the species

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 261-281

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011042721274

关键词

epidemiology; gene-for-gene resistance; metapopulation; pathogen; virulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coevolutionary processes are intrinsically spatial as well as temporal, and occur at many different scales. These range from single populations dominated by demographic and genetic stochasticity, to metapopulations in which colonisation/extinction dynamics have a large influence, and larger geographic regions where phylogenetic patterns and historical events become important. We present data for the genetically and demographically well-characterised plant host-pathogen interaction, the Linum marginale-Melampsora lini system, and use this to demonstrate the varying nature of resistance and virulence structure across these spatial scales. At the within population level, our results indicate considerable variability in resistance and virulence, but little evidence of coordinated changes in host and pathogen. Studies involving comparisons among multiple demes within a single metapopulation show that adjacent populations often have asynchronous disease dynamics and large differences in diversity and frequency of resistance and virulence phenotypes. Nevertheless, at this scale, there is also evidence of spatial structure in that more closely adjacent host populations are significantly more likely to have similar resistance phenotypes and mean levels of resistance. At larger scales, comparisons among adjacent metapopulations indicate that quantitative differences in host mating system and other life history features can have further major consequences for how host and pathogen variation is packaged. Finally, comparisons at continental and among host-species levels show variation consistent with specialisation and speciation in the pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据