4.7 Article

Regulation of carbohydrate partitioning during the interaction of potato virus Y with tobacco

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 51-59

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2000.00007.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To test whether carbohydrates may play a signalling function during plant pathogenesis, we investigated the interaction between tobacco and potato virus Y (PVY(N)). Four days after PVY(N) infection, leaves started to accumulate soluble sugars and leaf photosynthesis decreased. The accumulation of soluble sugars was accompanied by an induction of cell wall invertase and a gradual decrease in the sucrose-to-hexose ratio. In parallel to changes in carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthesis, transcripts encoding PR-proteins accumulated. Based on this coincidence, it was hypothesized that elevated hexose levels may enhance the expression of defence-related functions and might possibly explain the phenomenon of high sugar resistance in plants. This notion has been supported by the fact that cell wall invertase-expressing transgenic tobacco plants were found to be resistant against PVY(N) (Herbers et al., 1996b). To exclude the possibility that salicylate, which accumulates in plants expressing invertase, may be responsible for the observed resistance, these transgenic plants were crossed with salicylate hydroxylase-expressing plants (nahG). The progeny were selected for high levels of sugar and low levels of salicylate. Necrotic lesions also developed, typically formed on the leaves of plants expressing invertase, and transcripts encoding PR-Q accumulated in the absence of salicylate. On the other hand, accumulation of PR-1b transcripts decreased, indicating that sugars are not sufficient for PR-1b induction. Infection experiments using these plants as hosts revealed resistance towards PVY(N). Thus, the mechanism of apoplastic invertase induced virus resistance is salicylate independent and most likely sugar mediated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据