Natural selection and the joint evolution of toleranceand resistance as plant defenses

Plants can defend themselves against the damaging effects of herbivory in at least two ways. Resistant plants avoid or deter herbivores and are therefore fed upon less than susceptible plants. Tolerant plants are not eaten less than plants with little tolerance, but the effects of herbivore damage are not so detrimental to a tolerant plant as they are to a less tolerant plant. Biologists have suggested that these two strategies might represent two alternative and redundant defenses against herbivory since they appear to serve the same function for plants. I explore the relationship between resistance and tolerance, particularly with regards to how the joint evolution of these two traits will influence the evolution of plant defense. Although I briefly review some of the contributions of theory to the study of tolerance, I concentrate on an empirical, ecological genetic approach to the study of the evolution of these characters and the coevolution of tolerance and herbivores. In order to understand the evolution of any trait, we must understand the evolutionary forces acting on the trait. Specifically, we must understand how natural selection acts on tolerance. I review several studies that have specifically measured the form of selection acting on tolerance and tested the hypothesis that resistance and tolerance are alternative strategies. I also present a statistical analysis that does not support the hypothesis that herbivores are selective agents on tolerance. Finally, I consider a variety of constraints that possibly restrict the evolution of tolerance.