4.6 Article

No long-term benefit from hypothermia after severe traumatic brain injury with secondary insult in rats

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 3218-3223

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200009000-00017

关键词

traumatic brain injury; hypothermia; hypoxemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of application of transient, moderate hypothermia on outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a secondary hypoxemic insult. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University-based animal research facility. Subjects: Male Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: All rats were subjected to severe TBI followed by 30 mins of moderate hypoxemia, associated with mild hypotension. Rats were randomized to three groups: a) normothermia (37 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C); b) immediate hypothermia (32 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C initiated after trauma, before hypoxemia); and c) delayed hypothermia (32 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C after hypoxemia), The brain temperature was controlled for 4 hrs after TBI and hypoxemia, Measurements and Main Results: Animals were evaluated after TBI for motor and cognitive performance using beam balance (days 1-5 after TBI), beam walking (days 1-5 after TBI), and Morris Water Maze (days 14-18 after TBI) assessments, On day 21 after TBI, rats were perfused with paraformaldehyde and brains were histologically evaluated for lesion volume and hippocampal neuron counts. All three groups showed marked deficits in beam balance, beam walking, and Morris Water Maze performance. However, these deficits did not differ between groups. There was no difference in lesion volume between groups. All animals had significant hippocampal neuronal loss on the side ipsilateral to injury, but this loss was similar between groups. Conclusions:ln this rat model of severe TBI with secondary insult, moderate hypothermia for 4 hrs posttrauma failed to improve motor function, cognitive function, lesion volume or hippocampal neuronal survival. Combination therapies may be necessary in this difficult setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据