4.7 Article

Very early diagnosis and risk stratification of patients admitted with suspected acute myocardial infarction by the combined evaluation of a single serum value of cardiac troponin-T, myoglobin, and creatine kinase MBmass

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 382-389

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1760

关键词

myocardial infarction; diagnosis; prognosis; myoglobin; troponin-T; creatine kinase MBmass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The diagnostic and prognostic capacity of biochemical markers of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department were evaluated in consecutive patients (n = 155) with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Serum myoglobin greater than or equal to 110 mu g. 1(-1) and creatine kinase MBmass greater than or equal to 5 mu g.1(-1) had a high accuracy (0.77-0.85) (ns) for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis in patients presenting >2 h after symptom onset. Troponin-T (greater than or equal to 0.10 mu g . 1(-1)) had a lower accuracy (0.53-0.70) for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis, but was the most important 1-year prognostic marker (cardiac death or non-fatal acute myocardial infarction). In patients without ST elevation, combined analysis of two biochemical tests would accurately identify an additional 20% of acute myocardial infarction patients (predictive value of a positive test = 0.82) and also identify those without acute myocardial infarction (predictive value of a negative test = 0.80). One-year event-free survival was excellent (96%) for patients with two negative biochemical tests, intermediate (74%) for those with discordant tests, and only 53% for patients with two positive biochemical tests. Conclusion Analysis of biochemical tests in the emergency department prior to hospital admission could accurately identify approximately 20% additional acute myocardial infarction patients. The prognosis of these patients is poor, and they may be a target for primacy PTCA or new early initiated aggressive medical therapies. (C) 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据