4.7 Article

Laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Can follow-up CT after definitive radiation therapy be used to detect local failure earlier than clinical examination alone?

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 214, 期 3, 页码 683-687

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00fe13683

关键词

head and neck neoplasms; head and neck neoplasms, CT; head and neck neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; larynx, CT; larynx, neoplasms; larynx, therapeutic radiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To determine if follow-up computed tomography (CT) after definitive radiation therapy for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal (laryngopharyngeal) carcinoma allows the detection of local failure earlier than clinical examination alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and post-radiation therapy follow-up CT scans in 66 patients were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent definitive hyperfractionated radiation therapy and were followed up clinically for at least 2 years after its completion. Post-radiation therapy CT scans (N = 153)were evaluated for posttreatment changes with a three-point score: A score of 1 represented expected posttreatment changes; 2, focal mass with a maximal diameter of less than 1 cm and/or asymmetric obliteration of laryngeal tissue planes; or 3, focal mass with a maximal diameter equal to or greater than 1 cm or estimated tumor volume reduction of less than 50%. All patients underwent the first posttreatment CT study 1-6 months after therapy. New or progressive laryngeal cartilage changes were noted. The clinical impression of the larynx at the time of each follow-up CT scan was also recorded. RESULTS: In 12 of 29 (41%) patients with treatment failure at the primary site, follow-up CT scans were definite for local failure (score, 3) a mean of 5.5 months (median, 3.5 months; range, 1-17 months) before clinical examination results. CONCLUSION: In many patients, follow-up CT shows local failure earlier than does clinical examination alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据