4.7 Article

Effects of BG9719 (CVT-124), an A(1)-adenosine receptor antagonist, and furosemide on glomerular filtration rate and natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00532-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of furosemide and the selective A(1) adenosine receptor BG9719 on renal function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND Studies suggest that adenosine may affect renal function by various mechanisms, but the effects of blockade of this system in humans is unknown. In addition, the effects of a therapeutic dose of furosemide oil glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) in heart failure patients are controversial. METHODS On different days, 12 patients received placebo, BG9719 and furosemide. Glomerular filtration rate, RPF and sodium and water excretion were assessed immediately following drug administration. RESULTS Glomerular filtration rate was 84 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73m(2) after receiving placebo, 82 +/- 24 following BG9719 administration and a decreased (p < 0.005) 63 +/- 18 following furosemide. Renal plasma flow was unchanged at 293 +/- 124 ml/min/1.73m(2) on placebo, 334 +/- 155 after receiving BG9719 and 374 +/- 231 after receiving furosemide. Sodium excretion increased from 8 +/- 8 mEq following placebo administration to 37 +/- 26 mEq following BG9719 administration. In the six patients in whom it was measured, sodium excretion was 104 +/- 78 mEq following furosemide administration. CONCLUSIONS Natriuresis is effectively induced by both furosemide and the adenosine A(1) antagonist BG9719 in patients with CHF. Doses of the two drugs used in this study did not cause equivalent sodium and water excretion but only furosemide decreased GFR. These data suggest that adenosine is an important determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure. (C) 1999 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据