4.8 Article

Effects of lipopolysaccharide on TNF-alpha production, hepatic NOS2 activity, and hepatic toxicity in rats with cirrhosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 376-381

出版社

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80272-X

关键词

cirrhosis; endotoxin; nitrates; nitric oxide; sepsis; TNF-alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Septic shock results in high mortality in patients with cirrhosis, Nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) is induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and plays a major role in the inflammatory response to bacterial infections, Little is known about the regulation of NOS2 in cirrhosis under septic conditions. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine tissue NOS2 activity, serum nitrate and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) levels and hepatic toxicity in cirrhotic rats after LPS administration. Methods: Serum nitrates, TNF-alpha and transaminases were determined after LPS-administration in rats with secondary biliary cirrhosis and in sham-operated rats, Liver, lung, aortic and peritoneal macrophage NOS2 activities were determined by converting L[14C] arginine into L[14C] citrulline in a calcium free medium. Nitrate and TNF-alpha production were determined in a culture medium of peritoneal macrophages after irt vivo LPS administration. Results: LPS (1.5 mg/kg) induced 50% mortality in cirrhotic rats and no mortality in sham-operated rats. After LPS, TNF-alpha, nitrate and transaminase levels were significantly higher in cirrhotic rats compared to sham-operated rats. After LPS administration, there were no differences in NOS2 activity in the aorta, lungs, or peritoneal macrophages of the two groups, whereas NOS2 activity was significantly higher in the cirrhotic liver compared to the normal liver, Conclusions: In rats with cirrhosis, LPS administration induces higher mortality, hepatic toxicity, hepatic NOS2 activation and TNF-alpha release than in sham-operated rats. These results confirm the harmful role of septic shock in liver disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据