4.7 Article

Contribution of visceral obesity to the deterioration of the metabolic risk profile in men with impaired glucose tolerance

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 1126-1135

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s001250051503

关键词

impaired glucose tolerance; visceral obesity; lipid-lipoprotein; cardiovascular disease risk; men

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with metabolic alterations which increase car diovascular disease risk. The contribution of hyperglycaemia to this increased risk is, however, not clear. Abdominal obesity is often observed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance; our objective was therefore to find the contribution of visceral adipose tissue to the deterioration of the metabolic risk profile noted in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Methods. We studied 284 men with a normal glucose tolerance and 66 men with impaired glucose tolerance which was defined as a glycaemia between 7.8 and 11.1 mmol/l 2 h after a 75-g glucose load. Results. Men with impaired glucose tolerance had more visceral adipose tissue and higher concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin in the fasting state and following a 75-g oral glucose load than men with a normal glucose tolerance. They also had higher concentrations of plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B and lower concentrations of HDL-cholesterol as well as higher cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratios than men with a normal glucose tolerance. The two groups of men were then compared after a statistical adjustment for the amount of visceral adipose tissue. Although men with impaired glucose tolerance still had higher Easting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations after the adjustment for visceral adipose tissue, differences in all the variables of the lipid-lipoprotein profile were eliminated. Conclusion/interpretation. Visceral adipose tissue accumulation is an important factor in the deterioration of the plasma lipid-lipoprotein noted in men with impaired glucose tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据