4.4 Article

T-Cell-independent responses to Borrelia burgdorferi are critical for protective immunity and resolution of lyme disease

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 5190-5197

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5190-5197.2000

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI026815, AI-26815, AI-45253] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI026815, N01AI045253] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The humoral immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi during persistent infection is critical to both protective and disease-resolving immunity. This study examined the role of B cells in the absence of T cells during these events, using mice with selected immune dysfunctions. At 6 weeks postinfection,lan interval at which arthritis resolves in immunocompetent mice, arthritis severity was equivalent among immunocompetent mice, alpha beta(+)-T-cell-deficient mice, and mice lacking both alpha beta(+) and gamma delta(+) T cells. Arthritis severity was worse in SCID mice, which lack T and B lymphocytes. Carditis regressed in immunocompetent mice and those lacking both alpha beta(+) and gamma delta(+) T cells but remained active in mice lacking only alpha beta(+) T cells and in SCID mice, Mice lacking only alpha beta(+) T cells and those lacking both alpha beta(+) and gamma delta(+) T cells generated immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG3 B. burgdorferi-reactive antibodies. Sera from infected immunocompetent mice, mice lacking only alpha beta(+) T cells, and mice lacking both alpha beta(+) and gamma delta(+) T cells passively protected naive mice against challenge inoculation with B. burgdorferi. However, only sera from infected immunocompetent mice, but not sera from infected T-cell-deficient mice, were able to resolve arthritis when passively transferred to actively infected SCID mice. These data demonstrate that B-cell activation during a T-cell-independent response may be critical for resolution of arthritis and carditis and that protective antibodies are generated during this response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据