4.4 Article

Design of Potent, Non-Toxic Antimicrobial Agents Based upon the Structure of the Frog Skin Peptide, Temporin-1CEb from Chinese Brown Frog, Rana chensinensis

期刊

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 653-662

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2012.01363.x

关键词

cationicity; depolarization; haemolytic activity; hydrophobicity; membrane integrity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970352]
  2. Liaoning Key Laboratory Program [2008S131]
  3. Liaoning Excellent Talents in University Program [2007R27]
  4. Dalian Science and Technology Bureau [2011E12SF031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporin-1CEb shows antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, but its therapeutic potential is limited by its haemolysis. In this study, eight temporin-1CEb analogues with altered cationicities and hydrophobicities were synthesized. Increasing cationicity and amphipathicity by substituting neutral and non-polar amino acid residues on the hydrophilic face of the alpha-helix by five or six lysines increased antimicrobial potency approximately 10-fold to 40-fold, although when the number of positive charges was increased from +6 to +7, the antimicrobial potency was not additionally enhanced. The substitution of an l-lysine with a d-lysine, meanwhile maintaining the net charge and the mean hydrophobicity values, had only a minor effect on its antimicrobial activity, whereas significantly led a decrease in its haemolytic activity. Of all the peptides, l-K6 has the best potential as an antimicrobial agent because its antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is substantial, and its haemolytic activity is negligible. l-K6 adopts an alpha-helix in 50% trifluoroethanol/water and 30 mm SDS solutions. l-K6 killed 99.9% of E. coli and S. aureus at 4x MIC in 60 min, and its postantibiotic effect was > 5 h. l-K6 affects the integrity of E. coli and S. aureus plasma membranes by rapidly inducing membrane depolarization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据