4.5 Article

Structure and magnetic properties of NdFeB thin films with Cr, Mo, Nb, Ta, Ti, and V buffer layers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
卷 212, 期 1-2, 页码 59-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00789-1

关键词

coercivity; permanent magnet; energy product; thin films

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layers of NdFeB of the form A(20 nm)/NdFeB(d nm)/A(20 nm) where A represents Cr, Mo, Nb, Ta, Ti, V were prepared on a silicon substrate by magnetron sputtering. The purpose is to determine how (i) the chosen buffer layer and (ii) NdFeB layer thickness d (especially d < 200 nm) effect the structure, morphology and magnetic properties of NdFeB films. Films are annealed for 20 min and a few selected films are subjected to a rapid thermal anneal for 30 s. Other parameters (deposition rate, NdFeB composition) were held constant and we did not attempt to optimize these. After a 20 min anneal above 500 degrees C the main crystalline phase present is Nd2Fe14B with no preferred crystalline orientation. Our highest coercivities occur for buffer layer elements from row five of the periodic table, 20 kOe (1600 kA/m) in a Nb buffered sample with d of 180 nm and 17 kOe (1350 kA/m) in a Mo buffered sample with d of 180 nm. Buffer layers from row four (Ti, V, and Cr) and row six (Ta) all give lower coercivities. Our largest energy product, 10.3 MG-Oe (82 kJ/m(3)), is obtained for the Mo buffered sample. Average Nd2Fe14B crystallite size for this sample is 27 nm. Only the Cr and Ti buffered films show a large coercivity(greater than or equal to 2 kOe) for d of 54 nm with the Cr films showing the highest coercivity, 2.7 kOe (215 kA/m). In films subjected to a rapid thermal anneal (anneal time 30 s) we find that both the coercivity and energy product are larger than in samples subjected to a 20 min anneal. In our Nb buffered systems we obtain coercivities as high as 26.3 kOe (2090 kA/m) after a rapid thermal anneal. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据