4.6 Article

Spectroscopic properties of Mg-chlorin, Mg-porphin and chlorophylls a, b, c(1), c(2), c(3) and d studied by semi-empirical and ab initio MO/CI methods

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 2, 期 21, 页码 4962-4970

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b004998k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The semi-empirical and ab initio molecular orbital/configuration interaction (MO/CI) methods were used to study spectroscopic properties of chlorophylls a, b, c(1), c(2), c(3) and d and magnesium porphin and magnesium chlorin. Energy minimisation at the PM3 level of all chlorophylls put the magnesium atom away from the centre and above the porphyrin ring and the atomic charges on the nitrogen atoms became positive. At the ab initio HF/6-31G* level of calculation the magnesium is centrally located in the porphyrin plane and the atomic charge on the magnesium atom is positive and that on the surrounding nitrogens negative. Three CI methods used, ZINDO/S CIS (15,15), PM3 CISD (5,5) and ab initio CIS (5,5)/6-31G*, obeyed linear correlation between the experimentally observed and calculated spectroscopic transition energies. The PM3 CISD (5,5) method gave best estimates of Q(y), Q(x) and the Soret transition energies, but predicted oscillator strengths poorly. The ZINDO/S CIS (15,15) method gave best results in the overall simulation of the absorption spectra of chlorophylls, both intensities and wavelengths. The effect of solvent co-ordination on the excited states of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b was also studied. Calculations predict solvent induced spectroscopic shifts of the Q(x) and Soret transitions but leave the Q(y) transition almost unshifted. This is a result of solvent-induced energy level shifts and charge redistribution on the magnesium atom of chlorophylls in the excited states. The results are discussed with reference to spectroscopic properties of chlorophylls in solution, chlorophylls in aggregates and in photosynthetic light-harvesting antenna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据