4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Effectiveness of Agency for Health Care Policy and Research clinical practice guideline and patient education methods for pregnant smokers in Medicaid maternity care

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70492-3

关键词

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline; effectiveness; Medicaid maternity care; patient education methods; pregnant smokers

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL056010] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL RO1 56010 02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the extent to which tobacco exposure assessment and new patient education methods, derived from a meta-analysis and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline recommendations, could be provided routinely by trained Medicaid maternity care staff members and (2) to document the behavioral impact of these interventions among pregnant smokers. STUDY DESIGN: After 265 pregnant smokers were assigned at their first visit to an experimental group (n = 139) or a control group (n = 126), they received standardized risk information and were advised to quit smoking. The experimental group also received evidence-based patient education methods, including the videocassette Commit to Quit During and After Pregnancy, the publication A Pregnant Woman's Guide to Quit Smoking, and a brief counseling session. Self-report and saliva cotinine assessments of tobacco exposure were performed at baseline and at the end of pregnancy. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients quit smoking in the experimental group (17.3%) than in the control group (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The application of principles of organizational development and quality improvement at the management and clinical practice levels and the delivery of evidence-based health education methods by trained prenatal care providers significantly increased smoking cessation rates among pregnant Medicaid recipients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据