4.5 Article

Synaptic transmission in the neocortex during reversible cooling

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 9-22

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00109-3

关键词

visual cortex; cellular electrophysiology; temperature; excitability; action potentials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the effects of reversible cooling on synaptic transmission in slices of rat visual cortex. Cooling had marked monotonic effects on the temporal properties of synaptic transmission. It increased the latency of excitatory postsynaptic potentials and prolonged their time-course. Effects were non-monotonic on other properties, such as amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potentials and generation of spikes. The amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potentials increased, decreased, or remain unchanged while cooling down to about 20 degrees C, but thereafter it declined gradually in all cells studied. The effect of moderate cooling on spike generation was increased excitability, most probably due to the ease with which a depolarized membrane potential could be brought to spike threshold by a sufficiently strong excitatory postsynaptic potential. Stimuli that were subthreshold above 30 degrees C could readily generate spikes at room temperature. Only at well below 10 degrees C could action potentials be completely suppressed. Paired-pulse facilitation was less at lower temperatures, indicating that synaptic dynamics an different at room temperature as compared with physiological temperatures. These results have important implications for extrapolating in vitro data obtained at room temperatures to higher temperatures. The data also emphasize that inactivation by cooling might be a useful tool for studying interactions between brain regions, but the data recorded within the cooled area do not allow reliable conclusions to be drawn about neural operations at normal temperatures. (C) 2000 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据