4.6 Article

Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 561-570

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00012

关键词

counterfactuals; causality; epidemiologic methods; longitudinal data; survival analysis; structural models; confounding; intermediate variables; AIDS

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000052] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U01AI035042, R01AI032475] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [5-M01-RR-00052] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [UO1-AI-35042, R01-AI32475] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Standard methods for survival analysis, such as the time-dependent Cox model, may produce biased effect estimates when there exist time dependent confounders that are themselves affected by previous treatment or exposure. Marginal structural models are a new class of causal models the parameters of which are estimated through inverse probability-of-treatment weighting; these models allow fur appropriate adjustment for confounding. We describe the marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model and use it to estimate the causal effect: of zidovudine on the survival of human immunodeficiency virus-positive men participating in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. In this study, CD4 lymphocyte count is both a time-dependent confounder of the causal effect of zidovudine on survival and is affected by past zidovudine treatment. The crude mortality rate ratio (95% confidence interval) for zidovudine was 3.6 (3.0-4.3), which reflects the presence of confounding. After controlling for baseline CD4 count and other baseline covariates using standard methods, the mortality rate ratio decreased to 2.3 (1.9-2.8). Using a marginal structural Cox model to control further for time-dependent confounding due to CD4 count and other time-dependent covariates, the mortality rate ratio was 0.7 (95% conservative confidence interval = 0.6-1.0). We compare marginal structural models with previously proposed causal methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据