4.7 Article

A novel micromachined high-field asymmetric waveform-ion mobility spectrometer

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 300-306

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00535-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fabrication and characterization of a novel micromachined high-field asymmetric waveform-ion mobility spectrometer (FA-IMS) is described. The spectrometer has a 3 x 1 x 0.2 cm(3) rectangular drift tube and a planar electrode configuration. The planar configuration permits simple construction using microfabrication technology where electrodes and insulating regions are made with deposited metal films on glass substrates. The spectrometer is characterized using organic vapors (including acetone, benzene, and toluene) at ambient pressure and with air as the drift gas. Ions are created in air at ambient pressure using photo-ionization with a 10.6 eV photo discharge lamp (lambda = 116.5 nm). The micromachined FA-IMS exhibited behavior consistent with conventional FA-IMS designs where compensation voltage was effective in discriminating between ion species in high-field radio-frequency (RF) regimes. Excellent resolution of benzene and acetone ions in mixtures illustrates an advantage of the FA-IMS over low-field ion mobility spectrometry. Detection of toluene at concentrations as low as 100 ppb has been demonstrated. Improvements in detection limits, by as much as 100 x, are anticipated with improved ionization source designs. The ability to transport both positive and negative ions simultaneously through the FA-IMS drift tube is demonstrated here for the first time. Ion intensity is found to be proportional to sample concentration, although clusters of sample ions and neutrals at high concentrations illustrate the need for a drift region which is kept free of sample neutrals. Micromachining promises cost, size, and power reductions enabling both laboratory and field instruments. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据