4.7 Article

Relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with a decrease of the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and loss of spontaneous caspase-3 processing in vivo

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1606-1613

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401866

关键词

relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Bax expression; Western blot; videodensitometry; caspase-3 processing; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dysfunction of the p53/Bax/caspase-3 apoptosis signaling pathway has been shown to play a role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression, ie the development of acquired drug resistance. Low expression of the apoptosis inducer Bax correlates with poor response to therapy and shorter overall survival in solid tumors. In the present study, we analyzed the p53/Bax/caspase-3 pathway in a paired and an unpaired sample series of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at initial diagnosis and relapse. The data demonstrate that both Bax expression levels and the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio are significantly lower in samples at relapse as compared with samples at initial diagnosis (P=0.013, Wilcoxon signed rank test (paired samples); P=0.0039, Mann-Whitney U test (unpaired samples)). The loss of Bax protein expression was not a consequence of Bax frameshift mutations of the G(8) tract and could not be attributed to mutations of the p53 coding sequence (exons 5 to 8) which were detected to a similar extent in de novo ALL samples and at relapse. Analysis of the downstream effector caspase-3 showed loss of spontaneous caspase-3 processing at relapse. Whereas nine out of 14 (64%, paired samples) or 37 out of 77 (48%, unpaired samples) ALL patients at initial diagnosis displayed spontaneous in vivo processing of caspase-3, this was completely absent in patients at relapse (paired samples) or detected in only one out of 34 patients at relapse (2.9%, unpaired samples). We therefore conclude that in ALL relapse a severe disturbance of apoptotic pathways occurs, both at the level of Bax expression and caspase-3 activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据